🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.